CLARITY Act Gains Bipartisan Support in Crypto Reform

U.S. CLARITY Act Gains Momentum: What the Bipartisan Crypto Bill Means for Regulation, DeFi, and the Future of Blockchain

As Washington inches toward long-awaited cryptocurrency legislation, the bipartisan CLARITY Act is taking center stage—offering potential regulatory relief while stirring both optimism and concern within the digital asset space.

The digital asset industry in the United States has long operated in a fog of uncertainty. Now, with the CLARITY Act making its way through Capitol Hill, that fog may finally be lifting. Introduced in May by Rep. French Hill (R-AR), the bill has bipartisan backing and promises to resolve some of the most persistent regulatory ambiguities facing the crypto ecosystem.

But even as the bill heads into its first Congressional markup, it is generating lively debate. Industry leaders, policymakers, and technologists are weighing in—with some calling it a step forward, while others warn of hidden dangers for decentralized technologies.

What Is the CLARITY Act?

The CLARITY Act (short for "Creating Legal Accountability and Regulation in the Internet and Technology Year"—an unofficial expansion often attributed to its conceptual framework) picks up the regulatory baton where previous efforts, such as the GENIUS Act, left off. While the GENIUS Act focused on fostering blockchain innovation, the CLARITY Act zeroes in on establishing a clear regulatory framework for digital assets in the U.S. market.

At the heart of the bill is a proposed dual-agency regulatory model, where oversight of cryptocurrencies and digital tokens would be divided between the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

The CFTC would oversee digital commodities, such as Bitcoin and potentially Ethereum.
The SEC would regulate tokens that qualify as securities, using the Howey Test and additional updated guidance.

This distinction is a direct response to the "regulation by enforcement" approach that has frustrated the industry for years, often leading to inconsistent rulings and a fragmented compliance landscape.

Key Provisions of the CLARITY Act

Beyond simply assigning regulatory duties, the CLARITY Act seeks to modernize how digital assets are classified, managed, and governed. Key provisions include:

Asset Classification Standards: Clear definitions for digital commodities vs. securities.
Pathway for Reclassification: Tokens can shift classification over time, allowing projects to evolve from startup fundraising models to decentralized protocols without facing retroactive enforcement.
Consumer Protection Guidelines: Mandatory disclosures, anti-fraud measures, and provisions for user rights.
Infrastructure Exemptions: Developers, validators, miners, and relayers working on non-custodial or open-source blockchain infrastructure are exempt from registration requirements.
Self-Custody Rights: The bill affirms the right to self-custody, ensuring users can maintain direct control over their digital assets without intermediaries.
Peer-to-Peer Protections: The legislation reinforces the legality of peer-to-peer (P2P) crypto transactions, which are foundational to DeFi (decentralized finance).

These provisions position the CLARITY Act as a pro-user, pro-innovation, and pro-DeFi piece of legislation, while still attempting to preserve the traditional safeguards of U.S. financial oversight.

Industry Reaction: Hope with a Cautious Eye

The crypto industry has welcomed the bill—albeit with guarded enthusiasm. In a joint statement, eight major crypto trade associations, including the Blockchain Association and Crypto Council for Innovation, voiced support for the bill, praising it for potentially ending the state-by-state enforcement chaos and inconsistent federal oversight that has hamstrung innovation.

“The CLARITY Act could be a turning point,” said Kristin Smith, Executive Director of the Blockchain Association. “It offers the legal certainty we've been asking for, while respecting the decentralized nature of the technology.”

Venture capitalists, protocol developers, and crypto exchanges also applauded the bill’s exemption language, which protects those building critical blockchain infrastructure from being classified as financial intermediaries.

SEC Signals Crypto Reform as Atkins Rises, Industry Demands Clarity

However, not all voices are in harmony. Former CFTC Chair Tim Massad raised a red flag, arguing that the bill might tip too far toward accommodation, potentially at the expense of investor protection and systemic stability.

“In trying to codify clarity, we may inadvertently codify loopholes,” Massad warned in recent testimony before the House Financial Services Committee.

Bipartisan Support in a Divided Congress

One of the most remarkable aspects of the CLARITY Act is its rare bipartisan backing. In a political environment frequently paralyzed by partisan gridlock, digital asset regulation appears to be one of the few areas where Democrats and Republicans find common ground.

This support stems from a shared sense of urgency: Without regulatory certainty, innovation may flee U.S. shores for jurisdictions with more clearly defined rules, such as the European Union, Singapore, or the UAE.

By providing a clearer legal framework, the CLARITY Act could keep Web3 innovation anchored on American soil, fostering job growth, technological leadership, and consumer safety.

Amendments and the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act (BRCA)

Even as the CLARITY Act makes its way through markup, amendments are already in motion.

One notable addition is the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act (BRCA). This companion legislation seeks to:

Tighten the bill’s language
Offer stronger protections for developers working in open-source, non-custodial environments
Prevent overreach by federal regulators into decentralized platforms

Supporters argue that the BRCA ensures regulatory focus stays on bad actors and custodial intermediaries—not on neutral technology providers.

Yet critics warn that too many exemptions could lead to a “regulatory Swiss cheese”, where bad-faith actors exploit decentralized labels to avoid scrutiny. As always, the balance between innovation and protection remains delicate.

Potential Risks and Challenges Ahead

Despite broad support, several unresolved challenges remain:

Interpretive Risk: Even with clarified categories, regulators will still need to interpret nuanced token behaviors and evolutions over time. Ambiguity could persist.
International Coordination: Without harmonization with global crypto laws (e.g., Europe’s MiCA framework), discrepancies may arise that confuse multinational users and platforms.
Technological Neutrality: Critics want assurances that the law will not favor certain blockchains or development models over others.
Future-Proofing: The act must be adaptable to emerging technologies like AI-integrated blockchains, zero-knowledge rollups, and cross-chain interoperability.

What Comes Next?

The CLARITY Act is now entering a critical phase. The markup process—a series of congressional discussions and revisions—will likely determine whether the bill emerges as a robust framework or a compromised patchwork.

If successful, it could set a global precedent for smart regulation in digital finance. If it fails or becomes too watered down, the U.S